Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 120
02/16/2011 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB116 | |
HB8 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 8 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 116 - CORRECT SPELLING OF LORAZEPAM 1:07:14 PM CHAIR GATTO announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 116, "An Act making a corrective amendment to the Alaska Statutes as recommended by the revisor of statutes by correcting the spelling of 'lorazepam' and providing an applicability section; and providing for an effective date." 1:07:59 PM GERALD LUCKHAUPT, Assistant Revisor, Legal Services, Legislative Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs Agency (LAA), explained that HB 116 is a special revisor's legislation. There is another revisor's legislation, which includes all the other changes that have become outmoded in statute. Traditionally, the revisor hasn't placed criminal matters in the revisor's legislation because it can have an effect on past convictions. Therefore, HB 116 was introduced to correct the misspelling of lorazepam that occurred in 1982 and remained unnoticed until last year. Another reason for HB 116 is to have an applicability section that specifies this is merely a technical change that doesn't change the law. Therefore, HB 116 makes it clear that past [charges and convictions] involving "lorazepan" were meant to refer to "lorazepam". In response to Chair Gatto, Mr. Luckhaupt acknowledged that one could argue he/she is innocent [because the individual's charges involved "lorazepan," which doesn't exist]. However, that's why the applicability section of HB 116 is necessary; to specify that the misspelling was a clerical mistake. He offered his belief that there won't be any problem with past convictions or current prosecutions as the notion of strict code pleading went away some 50 years ago. Still, if there is a problem, the applicability clause attempts to fix it as best it can. Department of Law staff members agree that HB 116 is the best way to fix the problem. In response to Chair Gatto, Mr. Luckhaupt relayed that the misspelling was brought up last year with a prosecution in Fairbanks. He reviewed the case in which the misspelling of lorazepam, a form of valium, was discovered. He noted that this fix was added to legislation at the end of last year, but the legislation didn't get through the process. 1:11:48 PM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked whether the misspelling affected the prosecution of the Fairbanks case in which it was discovered. MR. LUCKHAUPT replied no; rather there was recognition that it was merely a misspelling in statute. In further response to Representative Pruitt, Mr. Luckhaupt surmised that the court recognized what the legislature intended to do, which wasn't to criminalize the possession of something that didn't exist. 1:13:18 PM REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON related his understanding that there are other misspellings in the same section. For instance, in AS 11.71.140(b)(1)(O) "oxymorphine" should be "oxymorphone" and in AS 11.71.170(f)(3)"propoxphene" should be "propoxyphene". He asked whether those misspellings could be addressed with HB 116. MR. LUCKHAUPT expressed the need to have time to research whether those are actual misspellings. He informed the committee that he went through a process with lorazepam to ensure that the misspelling wasn't merely a clerical error in the statute books, but rather something the legislature did. The misspelling of "propoxyphene" is simply a misspelling by Lexis Nexus in the statute books because the legislature actually passed the correct spelling, and therefore it wouldn't require a legislative change. However, "oxymorphine" is listed by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as "oxymorphine" and "oxymorphone." Therefore, he said he was hesitant to recommend a change until he has had time to research it further. 1:15:31 PM CHAIR GATTO, after ascertaining that no one else wished to testify, closed public testimony. 1:16:15 PM REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON moved to report HB 116 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, HB 116 was reported from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.